Friday, March 1, 2013

Blog 5: Japan’s Hope: If You Build It, They Will Come


Blog 5: Japan’s Hope: If You Build It, They Will Come

There are apparently too many universities in Japan.  The population of youth in Japan is continually declining, so the article asks, why are we continuing to build more universities? In 1992 there were about 2.05 million 18 years olds in Japan.  In 2012 that number decreased to 1.5 million.  What’s even more interesting is that the number of four year universities increased from 523 to 783.  According to the Ministry of Education, there has been a lot of thought being put into creating new departments and majors within these universities.  Since 2011, there has been an increase of over 200 departments, majors, and graduate programs.  “Since the 1990’s, more than 2,000 new academic departments and faculties have been created in Japan, despite an aging population.”  What is happening here is that the private institutions already in existence are dwindling in attendance, where there are currently 46% with vacant spaces.   Japan feels that by making the names of these new universities more appealing and modern-sounding, they will attract more students and increase their youth population and limit the empty spaces in some of these private institutions.  What the article explains is that Japan can build new universities, but has trouble getting rid of the universities they already have that are doing poorly.  Japan hopes that they may become associated with nontraditional departments that “emphasize forward-looking, interdisciplinary programs that fit the 21st century.”  Some experts feel that all they are going to accomplish is enrolling more students.  The issue here is that high school counselors claim their primary complaint from students is the confusion on what some of these new modern-sounding universities offer.  In 2009 60% of 1,200 undergraduate degrees were unique.  According to the administrators involved in these new programs, they feel that the curriculum will prepare students for changes in society.  For example, students may study business modernization, also known as “corporate innovation”, which will allow students to understand the character of individuals within social groups in society.  Some of these new programs are given these modern-sounding names for a reason.  The article suggests how it is impossible for education to not be linked with modernization.  Japan is trying to move forward attracting new students to prepare them and expose them “to a wide range of disciplines including business, public policy, [and] social psychology, with innovation as an important common thread.”  According to the dean of the Hirao School of Management at Konan University, what is most important is not what you learn, but how you learn.  Mr. Sato says that any student can take notes and memorize and do well on tests, but this rote learning is evolving, and the focus should be more on training students to become critical thinkers, who are capable of exploring and discovering their own answers.  “…the movement represents efforts to do thing that traditional schools have fallen short on” according to Dean Sato.  The main focus is here is preparing students to be able to compete in a globalized and modernized society.  Even more so, a third of students in attendance at Kokushikan University (in 21st century Asian studies), are non-Japanese, some students are from China, Iran, South Korea, and Russia.  According to one student, “’what’s great about this school is that you can learn about other Asian cultures and get to know the people from those cultures, and at the same time study Japanese language and culture.’”  Even though Japan is having trouble scrapping the more traditional universities with lower turnouts, and ironically new departments are being built because some of these private and junior colleges are doing poorly, it seems that Japan has the future in sight when building these new universities.  They are exposing students to different cultures, allowing them to become critical thinkers within society, and preparing them for the modern world.

I do not agree with the rising number of universities being built while there is such a decline in the youth population, but it seems that there is hope for the youth population to grow with the development of these new programs designed for the 21st century.  However, I feel that with so many private institutions falling behind, Japan should slow down a bit.  However, I couldn't agree more with an emphasis on how students learn as opposed to what they learn.  I encourage the 21st century learning and breaking out of traditional rote learning into more critical thinking, and culturally explicit programs for students to globalize and modernize. 

Jessica Hanley                                                                                                                                 
3/1/13
3:53 p.m.








No comments:

Post a Comment