Summary: This blog was about the third recent report
released by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which is a group of
officials in the United Nations that discuss climate change and possible
solutions. The Panel agreed that, without extreme restrictions and changes in
greenhouse emissions, there will be significant changes and potential
catastrophic disasters seen worldwide within the next 15 years. Without
limiting global warming, the average temperature (globally) could rise nearly 4
degree Fahrenheit – enough to lead to rising sea levels, inability to grow
adequate food, and mass extinctions of animal and plant species. The positive
end of solutions, such as implementing solar or wind power, is finding that
these energy sources are becoming cheaper. However, in order to cut harmful
emissions to an acceptable degree, new technologies will need to be added.
These new technologies have not yet been created, and when they are, they will
more than likely be quite expensive. The Panel found that, the costs in order
to clean up our environment would be quite significant and, while many
societies will be much richer than they currently are, over 5 percent will be
poorer than they were initially, before having to dole out the money to fix
previous generations mistakes.
Analysis: This article raised some really important points.
Climate change is a well-known issue that affects every living and non-living
thing on our planet. It will take a group effort in cleaning up the mess, just
as it was, for the most part, a group effort in creating the problem (though
some countries, our own being one of them, “donated” more to the issue than
others). Also, while it is easy to say you will cut down on emissions by using
public transportation or walking or some other small thing (that is in fact
still important), it really isn’t an easy matter. Much of the carbon gas
released into the atmosphere comes from industrial processes or factory
farming. So what can we do? Are we, as a developed country, really ready to
give up our industry or the (amount of) meat that is consumed here? Because,
from the way the article talks, there may either be new technologies created to
clean up the environment, or there may simply be huge taxes added on to
products or the production of products that are not environmentally safe. How
many of us will be able to afford these luxuries?
This article was published in The New York Times on Monday 14 April 2014.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/14/science/earth/un-climate-panel-warns-speedier-action-is-needed-to-avert-disaster.html?emc=edit_th_20140414&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=67003518&_r=0
No comments:
Post a Comment